Analysis of Current Status of Imported Equipment Agency Cooperation

According to Q1 2025 data from China Customs, industrialEquipment Importsvolume increased by 18.7% year-on-year, with agency channels accounting for 73% of transactions. The current market features three mainstream cooperation models:Single Agency System(23%),dual-track agency system(58%),Multi-Line Agency System(19%). Enterprises of different scales can select suitable solutions based on their business characteristics.

Comparison of Three Agency Cooperation Models

• Advantages of Single Agency System
  • Unified interface reduces communication costs
  • Accumulated order volume obtains better rates
  • Dedicated service team provides full-process follow-up
• Features of Dual-Track Agency System
  • Separate operations for core equipment and consumables
  • Different service providers for regional markets
  • Forms healthy competition to improve service quality
• Application Scenarios for Multi-Line Agency System
  • Equipment procurement involving multiple countries
  • Differences in special industry certification requirements
  • Annual procurement exceeding $5 million

Key Points for Multi-Agency Collaboration Management

Enterprises adopting dual-agency or more models need to establishThree Major Control Mechanisms:

• Establish a unified information sharing platform to avoid customs declaration data conflicts
• Develop standardized service evaluation systems (on-time rate ≥98%, document error rate ≤0.5%)
• Define clear responsibility matrices, especially for tax compliance procedures

Interpretation of 2025 Industry Regulatory New Rules

Announcement No. 2025-17 of the General Administration of Customs clearly requires:

• Equipment with the same HS code exceeding 3 import batches annually requires operation record filing
• Electromechanical equipment must provide qualification certificates of agency service providers
• Payments involving royalty fees must be declared separately

Typical industry cooperation model cases

Case 1:Medical EquipmentImport
A top-tier hospital adopted a dual-track agency system, with Agency A responsible for imaging equipment (Tariff No. 6.9018) and Agency B handling testing reagents (Tariff No. 3822), reducing customs clearance time by 40% through specialized division of labor.

Case 2: Precision Instrument Procurement
A semiconductor company chose a model of 1 main agent + 3 regional agents, ensuring core channels for Japanese lithography machines while saving 28% in logistics costs through regional agents handling auxiliary equipment.

Decision Recommendations and Risk Warnings

• Annual import volume < $1 million recommends single agency
• For multiple product lines, prioritize dual-track system
• Beware of duplicate documentation risks caused by multiple agents
• Ensure uniform pricing benchmarks among multiple service providers

Enterprises should select agency cooperation models that ensure operational security and cost-effectiveness based on actual import scale, product complexity, and supplier geographic distribution. Annual KPI evaluations of agency service providers are recommended to dynamically optimize cooperation structures.